Text first
Concepts and stories are grounded in the Zhuangzi chapter where they occur, not in floating quotation culture.
About the project · traceability before ornament
The aim is not to build a 'Zhuangzi-flavored site' but to assemble a revisable, citable, source-aware entrance to Zhuangzi. Each page is meant to answer the main question first, then show chapter context, common misreadings, and a small set of references a serious reader can continue with.
Question first, source text second, translation and scholarship third, page prose last.
Concepts and stories are grounded in the Zhuangzi chapter where they occur, not in floating quotation culture.
When pages cross languages, they check spellings, translations, and major interpretive summaries instead of relying on one inherited phrasing.
The published page should answer the reader's live question before expanding into nuance and dispute.
Project-level evidence is not hidden in internal notes. The sources page makes the current basis visible to readers.
Read The source layer is publicCoverage, evidence, and dates should stay visible, not hidden.
| Area | Current rule |
|---|---|
| Source section | Every page lists at least a chapter or book entry and a scholarly reference |
| Bilingual writing | English pages are rewritten for English readers instead of mechanically translated |
| Scope claims | The site states which chapters are live and which are not yet covered here |
| AI boundary | AI can assist wording and structure, but it does not replace source checking, translation comparison, or scholarly judgment |
| Updates | When evidence or coverage changes, the page date changes too |
A revision is for evidence change, not cosmetic churn.
When a page gains a stronger chapter link, source-text reference, or scholarly source, its date should move with the new evidence.
If a better textual context or scholarly explanation overturns earlier wording, the page should replace the weaker wording directly.
If the site cannot yet sustain a coverage claim, the claim should shrink first; only later should it expand again with real page coverage.
The current publisher is a unified editorial team, so the responsibility boundary, coverage, and revision cadence need to stay explicit.
| Item | Current state |
|---|---|
| Public byline | Pages are currently published under Chuangtzu.ai Editorial Team rather than dressing unverified personal claims up as scholarly authority. |
| Site first published | July 10, 2026 |
| Most recent site revision | August 24, 2026 |
| Current coverage | All seven Inner Chapters, the text map, core concepts, representative passages, modern notes, the source page, and the method page are live. |
| Correction rule | If better textual context or scholarship overturns an earlier wording choice, the page should be rewritten directly and its update date should move with the correction. |
| Minimum public citation standard | Public writing should check a site page together with the chapter entrance and a scholarly summary instead of quoting a site sentence in isolation. |
These answers clarify the page topic, common mistakes, and where to read next.
Yes, but strong citation practice still checks the page against the source text, translations, and scholarly references listed on the page.
Because Zhuangzi pages are revised as sources, coverage, and wording improve. Readers should be able to see recency directly.
AI mainly helps with structure, rewriting, and bilingual consistency, but it does not replace source checking, translation comparison, or scholarly judgment.
For academic use, verify claims against the source text, translations, and scholarship.
Corresponding Chinese page: 关于 Chuangtzu.ai | 来源、方法与修订原则